<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool browser archive and timeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nate.koechley.com/blog/2004/10/21/cool-browser-archive-and-timeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nate.koechley.com/blog/2004/10/21/cool-browser-archive-and-timeline/</link>
	<description>Web professional with deep frontend engineering expertise skilled in user experience design and product strategy. Successful team leader, manager, and executive. Sought-after speaker, writer, and trainer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: martinb</title>
		<link>http://nate.koechley.com/blog/2004/10/21/cool-browser-archive-and-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>martinb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nate.koechley.com/blog/?p=198#comment-67</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;
The font tag arrived with Netscape 1.1, as did tables, in summer 1995. That was the first browser that hinted that any kind of Design/layout would be possible. IIRC, it was where Dave Siegel sat up and took notice - I remember reading Severe Tire Damage days after it appeared and thinking &quot;shit! Complex tables+shims = near effective layout!&quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Missing 1.1 is a major omission!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Netscape 2.0&#039;s big innovation was Frames, which I hated on sight.
Yes it did have some Javascript, but not enough to do anything useful with. For that we had to wait until 3.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
The font tag arrived with Netscape 1.1, as did tables, in summer 1995. That was the first browser that hinted that any kind of Design/layout would be possible. IIRC, it was where Dave Siegel sat up and took notice &#8211; I remember reading Severe Tire Damage days after it appeared and thinking &#8220;shit! Complex tables+shims = near effective layout!&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Missing 1.1 is a major omission!
</p>
<p>
Netscape 2.0&#8217;s big innovation was Frames, which I hated on sight.<br />
Yes it did have some Javascript, but not enough to do anything useful with. For that we had to wait until 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinb</title>
		<link>http://nate.koechley.com/blog/2004/10/21/cool-browser-archive-and-timeline/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>martinb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nate.koechley.com/blog/?p=198#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the download to prove it:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://browsers.evolt.org/?navigator/32bit/1.1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://browsers.evolt.org/?navigator/32bit/1.1&lt;/a&gt;, which was also the 1st 32 bit Netscape version, Win95 having just been released that summer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the download to prove it:<br />
<a href="http://browsers.evolt.org/?navigator/32bit/1.1" rel="nofollow">http://browsers.evolt.org/?navigator/32bit/1.1</a>, which was also the 1st 32 bit Netscape version, Win95 having just been released that summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

